Molds
1.5 |
1 |
. |
. |
. |
3 |
1 |
|
1.5 |
1 |
. |
. |
. |
3 |
1 |
|
fluconazole | 1 |
1 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
2 |
1 |
. |
. |
. |
2 |
. |
|
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
. |
2.5 |
|
3 |
3 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
|
2.5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
. |
. |
. |
|
micafungin | 2.5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
. |
. |
. |
Moulds 3 = great. Use an antibiotic emperically if it is a 3.
2.5 = the best we got, but I sure wish we had better. OK to use emprically if we do not have any other choice.
2= adequate if susceptable, use with caution (ie know what you are doing and local susceptability patterns) but do not rely on it emperically if you do not have susceptabilities.
1.5 = if it is susceptable its great, but is almost never susceptable.
1= no way dude. You want a dead patient?
"?" = looks good in a test tube
R = resistant
"." = placeholder pending data